Getting Help in Writing Princeton Sample Essay

Getting Help in Writing Princeton Sample EssayBeing a Princeton University student is truly an exciting experience. You will encounter so many friends, classmates and other students from all over the world. You will also encounter a host of problems that will occupy your time. Some of the major problems that are faced by Princeton University students is plagiarism, homework assignment, academic problems, grade disputes, exams, and preparing for their field exams.The task of preparing for one's field examination is a big task because the University offers many fields for students to choose from. You will meet a number of professors in order to give you help in your studies. However, it would be ideal if you can get a tutor from a Princeton University who can give you suggestions on what to study and what to write about.A lot of students who are in trouble with the discipline of their assignments and exams find it hard to concentrate because they have to deal with a number of students who think that their writings are adequate in order to pass the exams. As a result, these students tend to start abusing the correct use of academic papers and essays.It is important for English majors to be well-read and well-informed because writing is a specialized field of knowledge. As a result, if you have a basic understanding of English, you can learn about what is being taught in the class and how the teachers teach the subject. With this knowledge, you will be able to formulate your own essay and assist your classmates in the process of writing their assignment.In addition, a lot of students may think that they are not very well-versed in the topic being taught but if you approach the writing assignments as an actual essay, you will realize that you are actually good at writing and you have good writing skills. This will enable you to get into the flow of things when it comes to writing the essay.What you need to know about the topic being taught is that the essay should c learly show the central theme or main theme of the course. It should provide information about the situation that has been faced by the author during the course of the course and the reasons behind the knowledge.Academic problems and solutions are writing to clarify the content that has been covered in the papers. In this way, the student will get a better idea of the level of education that he or she should have to learn in order to be able to succeed in a field where one has to do research.

Character Identity in the Taming of the Shrew Essay Example

Character Identity in the Taming of the Shrew Essay If something walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and acts like a duck, is it a duck? Probably, but what if this duck is really Just a confused chicken? At this point, the question of Identity comes Into play. Is the chicken then considered a duck because its actions all point towards that of the distinctive aquatic bird? Or does the chickens actual reality as a chicken, Its feathery DNA, matter more In this discussion? Identity In The Taming of the Shrew acts the same way. Haltingly the nature of Identity, Shakespeare uses the story of Christopher Julys taming and its counterpart, Skates aiming, to show that appearance becomes reality. Ultimately, the characters in The Taming of the Shrew blur the lines between reality and illusion, making them one and the same. In the beginning of the play, the small part of dialogue concerning Christopher Sly shows the phenomenon of illusion becoming reality. A rich lord abducts Sly, a drunken beggar, and plays a trick on him: What think you, if he were Rapped In sweet clothes, rings put upon his fingers, a most delicious banquet by his bed Would not the beggar then forget himself? (Shakespeare, Taming of the Shrew, Mind. 1. 33-37). When Sly awakens In an unfamiliar setting, he questions the truth of his predicament, but eventually, he wholeheartedly accepts the Illusion that [he Is] a lord indeed, and not a tinker nor Christopher Sly (Mind. 2. 68-69). Because Sly sees that he possesses all the characteristics of a lord ? fine clothes, dedicated servants, a noble wife ? he immediately accepts the facade. We will write a custom essay sample on Character Identity in the Taming of the Shrew specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Character Identity in the Taming of the Shrew specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Character Identity in the Taming of the Shrew specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer When he accepts his pseudo-nobility, Julys paradigm of his own reality shifts completely. He notices that he possesses all the characteristics off lord and adjusts his own identity accordingly: he becomes the lord. Initially, the changes in Sly are merely superficial; he gains obedient servants, nice clothes, and delicious food. Nothing about his personality should change, but It does. Not only does Sly state his belief In his nobility, but he also exhibits changes In his language, demonstrating the sincerity of his personality change. Critic Joseph Tate cites the fact that Sly form of speaking changes from prose, indicating a peasant, to blank verse, traditionally a form of speech used by poets and playwrights for aristocratic speech (106). Christopher Julys [rise] to verse and into nobility indicates that a real change occurs n Julys perception of himself and, therefore, in his actual Identity (106). Still the question remains: is Sly a true lord or Just an overdressed, indulged peasant tricked by a cruel, bored aristocrat? Shakespearean treatment of Sly story makes it seem as though he remains a lord. Introduced to Sly at the start, the audience naturally waits for his storyline to be continued, but Shakespeare never finishes It. Sly appears for the final time at the end of the first scene of act 1, and In this appearance, he merely complements the play Itself (1. 1. 243-44). This unfinished plot vice serves as a purposeful reminder that Illusion has become reality ? that Sly illusory nobility becomes actual nobility. Supporting this claim, Tate points out that Wendell ten plays plot Implies Tanat snatchers assume Ana seen Lugholes easily, inductions incompleteness proposes the opposite(Tate 107). Sly never return[s] to a world of stable identities and stays eternally as a lord (107). The implication that Christopher Sly becomes a lord and stays one indelibly within the play supports the idea that his identity changes permanently on the basis of appearance; the chicken as evolved into a duck. Immediately after Sly final line, Epithetic bursts on stage, establishing his identity as a bossy, violent, and outgoing young man. Although Epithetic never disguises his personality or intentions, his act of taming Kate contributes an additional example of how illusion and appearance becomes the reality of a situation. Epithetic, in an effort to tame Kate, devises a scheme in which he describes her behavior contradictory to what she actually does. For instance, Say that she rail, why then [he would tell] her plain she sings as sweetly as a nightingale. Say that she frown, [he would say] she looks as clear as morning roses (2. 1. 166- 69). His ruse transforms Skates identity from the shrewish spinster seen at the beginning into the dutiful wife whose speech at the end of the play indicates her new-built virtue and obedience (5. 2. 122). She is even respectful to her husband, to the point of calling him sir (5. 2. 105). Cecil C. Sermons proposes that Pedicurists method [of taming] is to suppose or assume qualities in [Kate] that no one else Suspects. What he assumes as apparently false turns out to be startlingly true (19). Therefore, Kate eventually becomes what Epithetic presents her as. Although at first Pedicurists descriptions of Kate seem only like his way to kill [her] with kindness (4. 1 . 181), his treatment [steadily unfolds to show] her really fine qualities: patience, practical good sense, a capacity for humor, and finally obedience, all of which she comes gradually to manifest in a spirit (Sermons 19). In the end, Kate turns into the modest Dove Epithetic claims her to be, demonstrating again that illusion has become reality (2. 1. 289). Kate, the shrew and eponymous character of the play, raises the most questions bout the reality of appearance. The most obvious question about Kate is whether she is truly tamed at the very end of the play. A less common, but equally interesting question is whether Kate is, in reality, a shrew. Are her bad attitude and violent tendencies only armor that Kate dons to protect herself from vulnerability and rejection? Perhaps. Several instances in the play imply that Kate is, in fact, gentler than she initially appears: the fact that Kate cries when Epithetic is late to the wedding; her allowance of her marriage to Epithetic in the first place; and her moieties reasonable pleas to Epithetic at the beginning of their marriage. These subtle details, however, become lost within the prominent examples of Skates fiery temper: yelling at her suitor; tying up her sister Bianca; and smashing an instrument over her tutors head, to name a few. Does it matter if her shrewish nature is merely armor? If everyone that has ever met Kate agrees that she is a shrew, even calling her Katherine the curse, then it does not really make a difference if it is a charade (1. 2. 121). Therefore, Skates relatives and neighbors define her identity, instead of Kate defining herself by how she feels. By believing that Katherine is a shrew [her community] makes near one, Decease Tanat Is ten only student position lately allow] her (Cooker 145). Because of the unpleasant outward appearance she gives off, Skates armor becomes a reality, regardless of what she feels inside. The last question of appearance versus reality is probably the most critical and common question of the play: is Kate really tamed? Well, she appears to be. At the end of the play in act 5, she obeys Epithetic, responding to his summons, unlike the other two wives. Her father seems to genuinely believe that she is changed as she had never been (5. 2. 119). She even gives a seemingly scolding speech to the other two wives, preaching the belief that thy husband is thy lord, thy life, thy keeper, / Thy head, thy sovereign (5. 2. 150-51). Although no critic and certainly no undergraduate dabbler in Shakespeare can say for sure the sincerity of Skates taming, I believe that many elements of the play combine to give a clearer perspective on this question. Christopher Sly story, a parallel in both situation and location within the play, paves the way for Skates reversal of personality. Sly identity transformation not only exhibits the nature of appearance becoming reality, but also leads the way for Skates complete reversal of identity from headstrong shrew to obedient wife in the final act of the play. By creating perfectly parallel circumstances, not only in situation, but also in location within the play, Shakespeare draws attention to the theme of illusion becoming reality, and perhaps even prepares the audience for the legitimacy of Skates transformation. Shakespeare manages to answer the question of the duck. If something has all the heartsickness of something else, it actually becomes, in all practical ways, that something else. He says that appearance is reality, or at least, it is the only reality that matters. Because of the analysis of Shakespearean use of Christopher Sly, Pedicurists deception in taming, and Skates actual nature as a shrew, the dominant question of the play grows clearer: whether or not Kate truly alters her thinking and personality to become tamed. Because of Shakespearean treatment of the rest of the play, it becomes evident that Skates illusion becomes the reality of her situation, and she, in all practical sense of the word, is tamed